IIAM OVERVIEW OF GRAMM-LEACH-BLILEY PRIVACY INFORMATION

A special report exclusively for IIAM  Members

Introduction

This guideline and suggested privacy notice are brief explanations and suggestions regarding compliance with the privacy provisions of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act. More detailed sources, such as those published by the Independent Insurance Agents of America, Inc., which is available to members only at www.iiaa.org, are available and should be reviewed by those agents having further questions or complicated corporate structures.  The following suggested forms are intended to address only the situations likely to be encountered in stand-alone agencies, that is, agencies operated as one entity or multiple agencies operated under common ownership, but involving only insurance agencies.  Any insurance agency that is affiliated in any way with another financial institution, or other business, should get special counsel regarding their privacy requirements and notices, as these forms are not prepared for their use.  Furthermore, the information contained herein, and the forms suggested, are intended only to address the privacy requirements of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act and do not address other potential privacy concerns such as the FCRA, the Federal Crime Act or HIPAA.

Overview

For those not previously focused on privacy issues, Congress created new requirements for those businesses in the financial services with the passage of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act  (“GLBA”).  Title V of the GLBA regulates the use of customer information, termed “non-public personal information”, by financial institutions, including insurance agencies.

Essentially the Act imposes three requirements:

1. Notice requirements.

Every financial institution must provide their customers, as defined by the Act, with a notice describing how the customer’s non-public personal information is handled by the financial institution, and to whom, if anyone, that information is disseminated. 

2. Opt out provisions.

Before a financial institution can share non-public personal information about a customer with a non-affiliated third party, the customer must be notified of their right to prohibit such sharing of information by executing an “opt-out” provision.

3. Security.

All financial institutions that collect non-public personal information must institute mechanisms for protecting the security and integrity of that information.

A further GLBA distinction should be noted.  The GLBA distinguishes between customers and consumers.  Every person with whom an agency has business dealings is a consumer, especially if the agency gathers information on that person, but only consumers with specific and on-going relationships are customers.  In the case of insurance agencies, that generally means a customer is one who has purchased an insurance policy from the agency.  The distinction is important because all consumers are entitled to the security protection of paragraph 3 above.  However, only customers are entitled to the notice and opt-out provisions noted in paragraphs 1 and 2, unless the agency plans to disclose non-public personal information about a consumer to a non-affiliated third party, which then entitles the consumer to the protections of the opt-out provisions.

The Maryland legislature has passed legislation that authorizes the Insurance Administration to issue regulations to enforce the GLBA.  While the regulations are not yet published, it is expected that the regulations will be similar to the model regulations developed by the NAIC.  The MIA expects to have the regulations published and approved by January 1, 2002. Agents do run the risk that they may be required to send notices to comply with Maryland regulations if they differ substantially. 

For insurance agencies the open questions are (1) how can they comply and (2) when is compliance required.  For ease, we can first address the security requirements of item 3 above.  Because portions of the GLBA requirements are effective July 1, 2001, each insurance agency should have a plan for the security of the customer’s private information that is non-public personal information.  Neither the GLBA nor the regulations are very specific as to the security to be provided, but at a minimum an agency should develop a memo to all employees instructing them not to discuss or disclose any non-public personal information without specific direction from the agency management.  The use of such information for regular business purposes may already be addressed by any written agency procedures, which should continue to suffice as part of the compliance for GLBA security.  An agency should also be expected to impose what could be viewed as fairly simple security rules.  If any other parties have access to the agency when it is closed, such as cleaning services, then file drawers should be locked, and computers should be closed out or turned off so no one can access the information in the computer system.  To the extent possible, agencies should use available computer security mechanisms to protect the information from outside hackers.

As to the notice provisions of GLBA, paragraph 1 above, the appropriate date to implement the notice provisions is subject to different interpretations.  Initially, the GLBA required compliance by 11/12/00, but the GLBA authorized regulators to extend that compliance date.  The Maryland Insurance Administration extended the compliance date to July 1, 2001 by Department bulletin, using the same dates selected by most federal agencies and most states by agreement at the NAIC.  However, the Maryland legislature just passed legislation.  The potential question is whether the GLBA allows the second extension of the deadline for the notice provisions.  The GLBA does not specifically allow such an extension, nor does it prohibit one.  While sending notices by July 1, 2001 ensures an agency’s compliance with GLBA, there is at least a good faith argument of compliance if the agency follows the January 1, 2002, date set by the Maryland legislature.

A primary concern for the insurance agency is what should be in the privacy notice.  Generally the agency wants to describe the type of non-public personal information the agency has, how it is obtained, how it is used, if it is disclosed to any affiliates or non-affiliated third parties, and most specifically if the information is disclosed through any joint marketing or service agreements.  If an opt-out provision notice is required, the notice should explain that as well.  The first notice must be sent by whatever date the agency determines is the legal requirement, and then annually after that.  The future notices could, of course, be included with renewal statements. 

Most insurance agencies will benefit from what is known as the “agent” exception.  Basically, this exception means that if all the non-public personal information the agency possesses is as a result of being an agent of an insurance company, and the insurance company has sent a privacy notice, then the agency is allowed to rely upon that notice and not to send an additional notice.  However, this exception would not apply to any business that is brokered, because in those situations the agency is not an agent of the insurance company.  Therefore, the insurance agency will be required to send a notice for all customers with brokered business.

Some questions exist as to what customers must receive a notice.  The GLBA and expected state regulations require the notice to go to customers with personal, family or household business with the agency.  This eliminates the need to send notice to commercial lines customers.  Many commentators also think this is true for farm, but if the farm is not incorporated, it may be difficult to separate what is farm from what is personal.  If you broker a farm, a notice will not hurt.

The final concern for the agency is when and how an opt-out provision must be provided to the customers.  Generally, an insurance agency must provide an opt-out notice if it discloses any non-public personal information to non-affiliated third parties.  The GLBA generally allows financial institutions, including insurance agencies, to share non-public personal information as long as:

1. The agency provides an initial privacy notice;

2. The agency discloses the recipient of the information;

3. The agency provides and opt-out opportunity to the customer; and

4. The customer does not opt-out.

Certain disclosures of information are exempt from the opt-out notice, meaning that no opt-out notice is required so long as the disclosure falls within these certain exemptions.  The primary exemptions are:

1. The use of the information is to complete the transaction for which the information was originally provided, for example, in an agency, the information is used in an application to place an insurance policy.

2. The agency has the consent of the consumer for the disclosure.

3. Specific legal requirements recognized by the GLBA or the enforcing regulation, for example to comply with court orders.

4. If the non-affiliated third party to whom the information is disclosed performs services or engages in a joint marketing agreement with the agency.  These services agreements or joint marketing agreements should be in writing and must contain an agreement that the non-affiliated third party will maintain the confidentiality of the non-public personal information.

Some commentators have expressed concern over what occurs if an agent wants to re-bid insurance for a customer.  The original transaction leading to the issuance of insurance would be exempt from an opt-out notice both from an agency exemption and from the consumer’s consent for that purpose.  However, since the customer may not know about the re-submission for new bids, is an appropriate consent involved, or should the agency provide a new notice?  Some commentators have suggested that agencies enter joint marketing agreements with all companies they represent, which would exempt the insurance agency from an opt-out notice under what is known as the “joint marketing exception”.  However, while such joint marketing agreements may eventually occur with most companies, not all companies are likely to be prepared for those by July 1, 2001.  Therefore, the simplest safeguard an agency could take at this point would be to obtain consent from the customer for the re-submission.  The agency may even want to create a form that advises all consumers at the time of the original application that the agency will use the non-public personal information it obtains to obtain coverages, and may later provide the same information to other companies for the purpose of obtaining the same insurance.  The consumer’s signature and consent to this form would provide some safeguards for the agency.

In summary, agencies are required to send an original privacy notice to all brokered personal lines customers.  All customers placed with appointed companies receive their notice from the company.  If non-public personal information is disclosed to non-affiliate third parties, then the notice must include an opt-out provision, unless the relationship is a service agreement or a joint marketing agreement.  The notices must be provided annually.